Cursor

Anysphere, US

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.7/5

Editorial estimate compiled from public vendor data — not a user-review average. How we rate

Visit Website →

📊 Quick Facts

Pricing Modelfreemium

Categorycoding

Users1M+ developers, Fortune 500 adoption

Founded2022

HQSan Francisco, CA, USA

Employees~200+

Monthly Visits10M+ (web) + millions of desktop users

LanguagesEnglish (IDE), Supports all programming languages

PlatformWindows, macOS, Linux

DeploymentDesktop Application

Data Snapshot2026-09-24

📝 About Cursor

VS Code-based AI IDE with Agent mode for multi-step coding. Paid plans include a monthly usage allowance; once it runs out you can add on-demand usage billed monthly at the same API rates, or upgrade to a higher tier.

💰 Pricing

Free: Hobby; Pro: $20/mo; Pro+: $60/mo; Ultra: $200/mo

✨ Key Features

Tab Completion: multi-line, context-aware, 100K-token context windowComposer 1.5: multi-file editing with adaptive thinking depth (RL 20x scaling)Agent Mode: fully autonomous — reads files, runs terminal commands, fixes errorsBackground Agents (v3.0): async task execution while you continue codingCloud Agents: run agent tasks on cloud VMsCodebase Indexing: semantic search across entire repositoryCtrl+K inline editing with natural languageCtrl+L codebase-aware chat panelMulti-model support: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet/Opus, GeminiFull VS Code extension compatibility.cursorrules for project-specific AI behavior

🏷️ Tags

codingideai-editoragentcomposer

⚖️ Pros & Cons

✓ Pros

Industry-leading AI technology with proven track record
Comprehensive feature set for diverse use cases
Strong integration ecosystem and developer community
Excellent performance and reliability at scale

✗ Cons

Premium features require paid subscription
Learning curve for advanced functionality
Limited offline capabilities in cloud-dependent workflows
May require technical expertise for optimal configuration

🎯 Use Cases

• coding

• refactoring

• debugging

• full-stack-development

• code-review

✔ Best For

Code GenerationCode RefactoringBug FixingCode ReviewDocumentationFull-Stack Development

🧠 Models

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Cursor)
GPT-4o (Cursor)
Gemini (Cursor)
Claude Opus 4.7 (Cursor)

🔗 Integrations

GitHubGitLabGitVSCode extensionsTerminalOpenAI APIAnthropic APIGoogle AI API

📈 Benchmarks

$1B ARR in under 3 years

Used by engineers at SpaceX, Shopify, and more

Agent mode: autonomous coding capabilities

Tab completion: 90%+ acceptance rate

🔀 Alternatives

GitHub Copilot Replit

⚖️ Comparisons

Copilot vs Cursor

📅 History

2023 Cursor launch - Initial release as AI-native IDE

2024 Agent mode - Adds autonomous Agent capabilities

2025 Composer - Multi-file refactoring with Composer

2026 Model expansions - Expanded model options including Kimi K2

❓ FAQ

Is Cursor free?

Cursor's free tier is the Hobby plan with limited AI usage. Paid plans — Pro $20/mo, Pro+ $60/mo, Ultra $200/mo — include a monthly usage allowance; once it runs out you can add on-demand usage billed monthly at the same API rates, or upgrade your plan.

How is Cursor different from GitHub Copilot?

Cursor is a full AI-native IDE, not just a plugin. It has deeper AI integration, including agent-like coding, whole-file editing, and terminal integration.

What models does Cursor use?

Cursor supports GPT-4o, Claude, and custom models. Users can choose which model to use for different tasks.

🇨🇳 China Insight

Cursor is accessible globally but can be slow in China due to API dependencies. Chinese developers appreciate its AI-first approach.

🔒 Data & Compliance

Data PolicyCode processed with privacy protections. Enterprise plans offer data processing agreements. Privacy mode available.

ComplianceSOC 2 (in progress), GDPR

Content ModerationCode safety filters; enterprise compliance features

Data RetentionCode processed per privacy policy; privacy mode available for sensitive code

🌐 Social & Community

X/Twitter Discord GitHub

💬 Reviews

ProductHunt: 4.8/5,G2: 4.7/5,Developer community: Highly recommended

ℹ️ How this page is built

This page is compiled by an automated pipeline from publicly available vendor information. It is not a hands-on review, and no editor reviews it before publication.

Ratings are editorial estimates derived from public vendor data (features, pricing, ecosystem coverage). They are not user-review averages, and we do not publish user ratings.

Data Snapshot shows when this entry was last refreshed from our directory dataset. Pricing and model line-ups change frequently, so confirm critical pricing on the vendor’s own site.

Read our directory methodology · Report an error